Section 3: Regulatory capital requirement for groups.

Articles in this section · 34

Article R356-24

French Insurance CodeIn force

Updated 7 Nov 2023

I.-The rules set out in Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27 apply, in accordance with the procedures set out in Article R. 356-25, to any insurance or reinsurance undertaking having its registered office in France which is the subsidiary of an undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8, where all the following conditions are met:

a) The subsidiary is included in the group's supervision and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution, as group supervisor, has not taken the decision referred to in Article L. 356-2 in respect of it;

b) The risk management procedures and internal control mechanisms of the undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8 cover the subsidiary and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution considers that the prudent management of this subsidiary by the undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8 is satisfactory;

c) The undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8 has received the agreement referred to in Article L. 356-19 ;

d) The undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8 has received the agreement referred to in Article L. 356-25 ;

e) The undertaking referred to in the first paragraph of Article R. 356-8 has requested authorisation for its subsidiary to be subject to Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27 and its request has been the subject of a favourable decision taken in accordance with the procedure set out in Article R. 356-25.

II.The rules set out in Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27 apply, in accordance with the procedures set out in Article R. 356-25, to any insurance and reinsurance undertaking with its registered office in France which is the subsidiary of a participating undertaking with its registered office in another Member State, where all the following conditions are met:

a) The subsidiary is included in the group supervision and the supervisory authority of the Member State in which the participating undertaking is established, in its capacity as group supervisor, has not taken a decision with regard to it similar to that mentioned in Article L. 356-2;

b) The risk management procedures and internal control mechanisms of the participating undertaking cover the subsidiary and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution and the group supervisor consider that the prudent management of the subsidiary by the participating undertaking is satisfactory;

c) The participating undertaking has received from the group supervisor an agreement similar to that referred to in Article L. 356-19;

d) The participating undertaking has received from the group supervisor an agreement similar to that mentioned in Article L. 356-25;

e) The participating undertaking has requested authorisation from the group supervisor for the subsidiary to be subject to rules similar to those mentioned in Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27 and its request has been approved.

III -Where the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution decides to apply the provisions of Section 3 of this Chapter to the parent undertaking which has its head office in France in accordance with Article L. 356-4, that undertaking is not authorised to request authorisation to make any of its subsidiaries subject to Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27.

The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may not take or maintain the decision referred to in I of Article L. 356-4 where the ultimate parent undertaking in France is a subsidiary of an ultimate parent undertaking in the European Union which has obtained authorisation to subject that subsidiary to Articles R. 356-26 and R. 356-27.

IV.-The conditions mentioned in I and II are specified by Article 351 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2015/35 of 10 October 2014.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More