Subsection 2: Certification of accounts

Articles in this section · 32

Article A823-6

French Commercial codeIn force

Updated 3 Nov 2023

The professional practice standard on the application of the concept of materiality when planning and performing an audit, approved by the Garde des Sceaux, Minister of Justice, is shown below:

APPLICATION OF THE NOTION OF SIGNIFICANCE WHEN PLANNING AND PERFORMING AN AUDIT

Introduction

1. For the purpose of expressing an opinion on the financial statements, the statutory auditor performs an audit to obtain high-level but not absolute assurance, conventionally referred to as "reasonable assurance", that the financial statements taken as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether by amount or by nature.

2. The purpose of this standard is to define the principles relating to the application by the statutory auditor of the concept of materiality when planning and performing an audit. In addition, the standard "Assessment of Misstatements Identified During the Audit" explains how this same concept is applied by the statutory auditor when considering the impact on the audit of identified misstatements and when assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements.

Definitions

3. Misstatement: inaccurate, inadequate or omitted accounting or financial information due to error or fraud. A misstatement arises from a difference between the amount, classification, presentation or disclosure provided in the accounts for an item, and the amount, classification, presentation or disclosure required for that same item by the applicable financial reporting framework.

4. Material misstatement: inaccurate, inadequate or omitted accounting or financial information due to error or fraud of such significance that, alone or in combination, it could influence the judgement of a user of financial or accounting information.

5. Uncorrected misstatements: misstatements other than obviously insignificant ones that the auditor has summarised during the audit and which have not been corrected.

6. Materiality threshold: amount beyond which economic decisions or judgement based on the accounts are likely to be influenced.

7. Planning threshold: threshold of an amount lower than the materiality threshold used by the auditor to define the nature and scope of his work. The planning threshold is set at an amount that reduces to an acceptable level the risk that the amount of uncorrected identified misstatements and undetected misstatements will exceed the materiality threshold.

Concept of materiality in the audit context

8. The concept of materiality is applied by the statutory auditor in planning and performing the audit and in considering the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and, where appropriate, in assessing the effect of uncorrected misstatements on the accounts. It is also applied by the statutory auditor in expressing an opinion on the accounts.

9. The statutory auditor applies the concept of materiality in the context of the audit of the accounts by considering not only the amount of the misstatements but also their nature. The auditor also takes into account the particular circumstances in which the misstatements occurred: the circumstances surrounding certain misstatements may lead the auditor to deem them material even if their amount is not material.

10. The determination of whether a misstatement is material is a matter for the auditor's professional judgement and is influenced by the auditor's perception of the financial information needs of the users of the financial statements.

11. In this context, the auditor is justified in considering that users :

a) Have some knowledge of the entity's activities and its economic environment as well as of accounting and that they will analyse the accounts carefully;

b) Are aware that the accounts are audited taking into account the materiality of the information ;

c) Are aware of the uncertainties inherent in valuing certain amounts based on estimates, the exercise of professional judgement and the consideration of future events; and

d) Make economic decisions based on the information contained in the accounts.

12. To assess the materiality of a misstatement based on its amount, the statutory auditor determines one or more materiality thresholds.

13. In determining the nature and extent of audit procedures to be performed, the statutory auditor uses an engagement planning threshold or thresholds.

Determining the materiality threshold or thresholds

14. When planning the audit, the statutory auditor shall determine a materiality level at the level of the accounts taken as a whole.

15. If, in the specific context of the entity, there are classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements below the materiality level set for the accounts as a whole could influence the judgement of users of the accounts or the economic decisions they make on the basis of the accounts, the statutory auditor will consider whether to also set a lower materiality level(s) for those classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures.

16. In assessing whether materiality levels lower than the materiality level adopted at the level of the accounts taken as a whole are necessary for certain categories of transactions, certain account balances or certain disclosures in the notes to the accounts, the statutory auditor shall in particular take into account:

- sensitive information in the accounts in relation to the entity's sector of activity;

- the existence of accounting rules or legal or regulatory texts specific to the entity or its sector; or

- the completion of particular transactions during the financial year.

17. On the basis of his professional judgement, the statutory auditor identifies relevant criteria on the basis of which, by applying rates or other calculation methods, he determines the materiality threshold or thresholds. These criteria may be, for example:

- profit on ordinary activities;

- net profit;

- turnover;

- shareholders' equity; or

- net debt.

18. The choice of these criteria depends in particular on:

- the structure of the entity's accounts;

- the presence in the accounts of items to which some of the users relying on the accounts are likely to be particularly attentive;

- the entity's sector of activity;

- the entity's ownership structure or its financing;

- their variability over time.

Determining the planning threshold(s)

19. When planning the audit, the statutory auditor shall determine a planning threshold(s) for the engagement.

20. Determining the planning threshold is not just a matter of arithmetic but also of professional judgement. When determining this threshold, the statutory auditor relies on his knowledge of the entity, updated during the performance of risk assessment procedures, and takes into account the risk of misstatement of the current year's accounts in the light, in particular, of the nature and extent of misstatements identified during previous audits. The planning threshold is lower than the materiality threshold. It is generally determined by applying a percentage to the latter.

21. If the statutory auditor has considered it necessary to set one or more materiality thresholds of lower amounts for certain flows of transactions, account balances or information, he determines for this or each of these materiality thresholds a planning threshold.

Modification of materiality thresholds

or planning thresholds during the engagement

22. During the engagement, the statutory auditor reconsiders the materiality threshold or thresholds if he becomes aware of new facts or developments in the entity that call into question the initial assessment of those thresholds. This may be the case, for example, when the threshold or thresholds were determined on the basis of forecasts that differ significantly from actual results.

23. If the statutory auditor concludes that the setting of a lower materiality threshold or thresholds than that or those originally set is appropriate, the statutory auditor shall determine whether it is necessary to change the planning threshold or thresholds, and whether the nature and extent of further audit procedures it has defined remain appropriate.

Documentation

24. The statutory auditor shall include in his file the materiality threshold(s) and the planning threshold(s) that he has selected as well as the criteria taken into account to determine them. He shall also include in his file any changes made to these amounts during the audit and the explanations relating thereto.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More