Subsection 1: General provisions on the valuation of prudential technical provisions

Articles in this section · 15

Article R351-2

French Insurance CodeIn force

Updated 7 Nov 2023

I - The value of the prudential technical provisions referred to in Article L. 351-2 is equal to the sum of the best estimate and the risk margin.

II - The best estimate corresponds to the probability-weighted average of future cash flows taking into account the time value of money estimated on the basis of the relevant risk-free rate curve, i.e. the expected present value of future cash flows.

The calculation of the best estimate is based on up-to-date and credible information and realistic assumptions, using appropriate, applicable and relevant actuarial and statistical methods.

The cash flow projection used in the calculation of the best estimate takes into account all cash inflows and outflows required to meet the insurance and reinsurance obligations, over their entire duration.

The best estimate is calculated gross, without deducting receivables arising from reinsurance contracts and securitisation vehicles. The amount of these receivables is calculated separately, in accordance with article R. 351-12.

The set of contracts giving rise to the aforementioned liabilities to be taken into account is defined in Article 17 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2015/35 of 10 October 2014. The boundaries of these contracts are defined in Article 18 of the same Regulation.

The requirements for data quality and the conditions under which approximations are allowed are defined in Articles 19 to 21 of the same Regulation.

The assumptions to be used for the calculation of prudential technical provisions are defined in articles 22 to 26 of the same regulation.

The methods for projecting cash flows are defined in articles 28 to 36 of the same regulation.

The relevant risk-free rate curve is defined in articles 43 to 61 of the same regulation.

III-The risk margin is calculated in such a way as to ensure that the value of the prudential technical provisions referred to in Article L. 351-2 is equivalent to the amount that an undertaking authorised to carry on insurance or reinsurance business would require in order to take over and honour the insurance and reinsurance commitments.

IV - Insurance and reinsurance undertakings carry out a separate valuation of the best estimate and the risk margin.

However, where future cash flows relating to insurance and reinsurance commitments can be reliably replicated using financial instruments for which there is a reliable observable market value, the value of prudential technical provisions referred to in Article L. 351-2, relating to these future cash flows, is determined using the market value of these financial instruments. In this case, it is not necessary to calculate the best estimate and the risk margin separately.

Article 40 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of 10 October 2014 specifies the circumstances in which a separate calculation of the best estimate and risk margin is not required.

Where insurance and reinsurance undertakings carry out a separate assessment of the best estimate and the risk margin, they shall calculate the risk margin by determining the cost of raising an amount of eligible own funds equal to the Solvency Capital Requirement necessary to meet their liabilities for the full duration of those liabilities. For the purposes of assessing the risk margin, the Solvency Capital Requirement does not include the additional capital requirements imposed by the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution, pursuant to Article L. 352-3.

The cost of capital rate is the rate used to determine the cost of raising this amount of eligible own funds. This rate is the same for all insurance and reinsurance undertakings and is revised periodically.

The cost of capital rate used is equal to the additional rate, over and above the relevant risk-free interest rate, which would be borne by an undertaking holding an amount of eligible own funds, referred to in Article L. 351-6, equal to the Solvency Capital Requirement which is necessary to meet the insurance and reinsurance commitments throughout their term.

The cost of capital rate is set in Article 39 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of 10 October 2014.

The methods for calculating the risk margin are set out in Articles 37 and 38 of the same Regulation.

The simplification methods for calculating prudential technical provisions, the risk margin and the conditions precedent to their use are defined in Articles 56 to 61 of the same Regulation.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More