Paragraph 1: General procedural rules

Articles in this section · 9

Article R331-24

French Intellectual Property CodeIn force

Updated 7 Nov 2023

I.-A referral to the Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique shall be made by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or, in accordance with the procedures laid down by the authority, by electronic transmission. It shall include:

the name and address of the applicant, as well as, where applicable, its articles of association and the mandate given to its representative or counsel;

documents proving that the applicant falls into one of the categories of persons authorised to refer matters to the authority by virtue of the provisions of this sub-section or articles L. 137-4, L. 219-4, L. 331-29 to L. 331-31 and L. 331-33;

-the purpose of the referral, which must be substantiated, and the documents on which it is based.

II.-When the matter is referred to the authority pursuant to Articles L. 331-29 to L. 331-31, the applicant must also specify the name and, if known to the applicant, the address of the parties that the applicant is challenging.

III.-When the matter is referred to the authority pursuant to the provisions of article L. 331-29, the applicant must also specify the nature and content of the project whose implementation requires access to the information essential to the interoperability that he is requesting, and justify that he has requested and been refused such access either by the holder of the rights to the technological measure, or by the supplier, publisher or person importing or transferring the information or the technological measure in question from a Member State of the European Union. Failure to offer such access on reasonable terms and within a reasonable period of time is deemed to be a refusal.

IV.-When the matter is referred to the authority pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 331-30, the applicant must also prove that he has asked the rightholder who uses the technological protection measure to take the appropriate measures to enable the effective exercise of an exception to copyright and related rights mentioned in Article L. 331-28. Failure to propose the implementation of such measures within a reasonable period of time is deemed to be a refusal.

V.-When the matter is referred to the authority by a person or establishment making reproductions or representations of a protected work or object adapted for disabled persons, as referred to in 7° of Article L. 122-5, the applicant must also provide proof that it is approved under 2° of Article L. 122-5-1 and that it has requested and been refused the transmission of the digital file of a printed work by the depository organisation referred to in the same 2°.

If the referral is not accompanied by these elements, a request for regularisation is sent to the applicant or his authorised representative, who must respond and provide the additions within a period of one month.

The four-month period mentioned in articles L. 331-29 and L. 331-32 runs from the date of receipt of the complete file by the authority.

The submission of briefs, observations or supporting documents by a party before the authority under the signature and stamp of a lawyer entails election of domicile.

VI.-When the matter is referred to the authority pursuant to the provisions of articles L. 137-4 and L. 219-4, the applicant must also state the subject matter and processing of the prior complaint lodged with the provider of the online content sharing service and the domain name of this service. Depending on whether the claimant is a user or a rightholder, the claimant must also specify, if known, the name of the rightholder or user who is a party to the proceedings within the meaning of this sub-section.

If the claim is not lodged within the meaning of this sub-section, the claimant must specify the name of the rightholder or user who is a party to the proceedings within the meaning of this sub-section. If the referral is not accompanied by these elements, a request for regularisation is sent to the applicant or his authorised representative, who must reply and provide the additional information within a period of one month.

The one-month period referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this sub-section is extended by one month. The one-month period referred to in articles L. 137-4 and L. 219-4 runs from the date of receipt of the complete file by the authority.

The submission of briefs, observations or comments by the applicant or his authorised representative must be made within one month. The production of briefs, observations or supporting documents by a party before the authority under the signature and stamp of a lawyer shall constitute election of domicile.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More