2
Judgments the court must render in a standard class action: the first on liability and the framework; the second on unsatisfied compensation claims.
Bref délai
The accelerated appeal procedure applicable to class action judgments — designed to avoid delay to the consumer information campaign.
Asymmetric
The res judicata effect: the first judgment binds the professional immediately; it only binds individual consumers once their damage has been repaired under the procedure.

How the Procedure Fits Together

The action de groupe's six-stage procedure has a distinctive architecture: it is built around a first judgment that determines everything except who the individual claimants are. Consumers are not parties to the proceedings at the time of the first judgment — the group that will ultimately be compensated is defined in the abstract and then progressively constituted through an information campaign and an opt-in adhesion window. Only once the consumer information measures are exhausted and the adhesion window has closed does the shape of the defendant's actual financial exposure become clear. The court retains jurisdiction through both judgments and the mise en état phase between them.

Stage 1 — The Summons: Individual Cases Required on Pain of Nullity

1
Summons (Assignation) with Individual Cases Arts. R 623-3, L 623-27 — Summons served by commissaire de justice

The action de groupe is initiated by an assignation — a formal summons served by a commissaire de justice — citing the professional to appear before the tribunal judiciaire. The summons must comply with the general procedural requirements for contested written proceedings before the tribunal judiciaire (CPC Arts. 54, 56, and 752) and must include, on pain of nullity, an express statement of the individual cases presented by the association in support of its action (Art. R 623-3, al. 1). A copy of the association's approval decree must be attached (Art. R 623-3, al. 2).

The Individual Cases Requirement

The individual cases (cas individuels) are the factual foundation on which the court will assess the professional's liability and the harm categories. The statute sets no minimum number of individual cases — in practice, associations typically cite cases that have already been the subject of individual court judgments against the same professional. The juge de la mise en état has no power to rule on the relevance of the individual cases included in the summons: that assessment belongs to the court on the merits (Cass. 1re civ., 27 June 2018, n° 17-10.891 F-PBI, Bull. civ. I n° 118).

Immediate Effect: Prescription Suspension

From the moment the summons is filed, the prescription of every individual consumer's action for the same harm against the same professional is suspended. Prescription restarts for a minimum of six months from the first judgment or from the homologation of a mediation agreement (Art. L 623-27). Consumers can therefore choose, after the judgment, not to join the group and pursue their own individual action.

Stage 2 — The First Judgment: Liability, Group, Damages, and Framework

2
First Judgment: Everything Except the Identities of the Claimants Arts. L 623-4 to L 623-13; R 623-8 — Appeal: bref délai (Art. R 623-4)

The first judgment is the central event in the proceedings. The court addresses, all in the same decision, the following mandatory elements:

Mandatory Contents of the First Judgment
  • The professional's liability (Art. L 623-4): assessed on the basis of the individual cases presented. The court must decide whether liability is established before proceeding to the remaining elements
  • The definition of the group and the criteria for membership (Art. L 623-4): the group is defined in the abstract — for example, "consumers who purchased product X bearing lot number Y." The individual members of the group are not yet known at this stage
  • The harms and their compensation (Art. L 623-5): the categories of patrimonial harm eligible for compensation for each consumer or category of consumers constituting the group, and either the amounts or all the elements enabling their evaluation
  • The consumer information measures (Art. L 623-7): the modalities and channels for informing potential group members — national or regional press, television, radio, professional's website, association's website, social media, email, SMS. The judgment must also fix the deadline within which the professional must implement these measures at their own expense
  • The adhesion window and modalities (Art. L 623-8): the 2-to-6-month period during which consumers may join, and whether they must approach the professional, the association, or the court-appointed auxiliary
  • The compensation conditions and deadlines (Arts. L 623-11, L 623-18): how compensation is to be delivered, within what period, and what the professional must pay each adhering consumer
  • The deadline for bringing unsatisfied claims back before the court (Art. L 623-11): the date by which the association must file unsatisfied compensation claims so the court can address them in its second judgment
  • Referral to mise en état (Art. R 623-8): the hearing date at which unsatisfied claims will be examined
Optional Contents of the First Judgment
  • Appointment of an avocat, commissaire de justice, or other regulated judicial professional to assist the association in handling the volume of compensation requests (Art. L 623-13)
  • Conditions for in-kind repair if the court finds it more appropriate than monetary compensation (Art. L 623-6)
  • A provision on the association's non-recoverable costs (Art. L 623-12, al. 1): the professional can be ordered to pay a provision on the association's legal costs beyond those recoverable as dépens
  • A consignation of part of the sums owed at the Caisse des dépôts et consignations (Art. L 623-12, al. 2)
What the Court Can Order to Assess Harm

At any point in the proceedings, the court may order any legally admissible investigative measure necessary for the preservation of evidence or the production of documents — including documents held by the professional itself (Art. R 623-9). Available measures include personal verification by the judge, testimony and enquiries, and expert assessment.

The Appeal: Accelerated Bref Délai Procedure

An appeal against the first judgment must be decided under the fixation à bref délai procedure (Art. R 623-4, CPC Art. 905). This accelerated appeal track allows the president of the relevant chambre of the court of appeal to set a hearing date rapidly. The purpose is to avoid prolonged delay to the consumer information phase: the judgment cannot be published and no information campaign can begin until appeals (including the pourvoi en cassation) are exhausted.

The Information Campaign Is Locked Until Appeals Are Exhausted

The consumer information measures ordered by the first judgment cannot be implemented until the judgment is no longer subject to any ordinary challenge (appeal, opposition) or to a pourvoi en cassation (Art. L 623-7). This rule does not apply to competition-law class actions, where provisional execution of the information measures may be ordered (Art. L 623-26). In standard consumer class actions, a professional who appeals the first judgment effectively delays the start of the information campaign — and therefore the entire subsequent procedure — for the duration of the appeal. The bref délai procedure is designed to keep this delay manageable, but even an accelerated appeal can add months to the timeline.

Stage 3 — The Consumer Information Campaign

3
Consumer Information: The Professional Bears the Cost Art. L 623-7; R 623-7; R 623-16 — Content mandatory under R 623-16

Once the first judgment is no longer subject to challenge, the professional must implement the information measures ordered by the court, at their own expense, within the deadline the judgment fixes. If the professional fails to implement the measures within that deadline, the association steps in and implements them — still at the professional's expense (Art. L 623-7, al. 2 and R 623-7).

The court has unlimited discretion as to the form of the information campaign: national or regional print press, audiovisual media, the professional's own website, the association's website, social media channels, email, and SMS are all available. Multiple channels can be required simultaneously.

Mandatory Content of the Information (Art. R 623-16)
  • The operative part (dispositif) of the judgment
  • The contact details of the person to whom each consumer must address their adhesion to the group
  • The form, content, and deadline for adhesion
  • A statement that adhesion constitutes a mandate to the association for indemnification purposes
  • A warning that failure to join within the deadline permanently forecloses the consumer from class action compensation
  • A warning that once compensated within the class action, the consumer cannot bring an individual action for the same harm (though they may still seek compensation for other harm)
  • A requirement that consumers produce all useful documents in support of their claim

Stage 4 — The Adhesion Window: 2 to 6 Months

4
Opt-In Adhesion: Consumers Join the Group Arts. L 623-8, L 623-9, L 623-32; R 623-17 to R 623-21

Each eligible consumer must expressly join the group within the adhesion window fixed by the court. The window is not less than two months and not more than six months, measured from the completion of the information campaign (Art. L 623-8, al. 1). The modalities are determined by the court; consumers may be directed to approach the professional directly, the association, or an auxiliary. Any contractual clause preventing a consumer from participating is automatically deemed non-written (Art. L 623-32).

Form and Content of Adhesion (Art. R 623-17)

Adhesion may be made by any means providing written acknowledgment. It must contain the consumer's name, first name, and address, and, if applicable, an email address for procedure-related communications. It must specify the amount claimed in compensation for the harm invoked, having regard to the first judgment's provisions.

Effects of Adhesion
  • Adhesion constitutes a mandate to the association for indemnification purposes (Art. L 623-9), including the power to perform all procedural acts and to exercise all appeals (Art. R 623-20). Adhesion does not imply membership of the association itself
  • The association advances all costs and fees of the procedure on the consumer's behalf (Art. R 623-20, al. 2)
  • The mandate is revocable at any time; revocation automatically constitutes withdrawal from the group (Art. R 623-21)
  • Adhesion to the group does not prevent a consumer from bringing individual actions for harm outside the scope defined by the court — for example, for personal injury or moral harm (Art. L 623-29)

Stage 5 — Compensation of Adhering Consumers and Mise en État

5
Compensation Phase: The Professional Must Pay Each Member Arts. L 623-10, L 623-11, L 623-18, L 623-21; R 623-23 to R 623-25

The professional must compensate each consumer who has adhered to the group within the conditions, limits, and deadlines set by the first judgment (Art. L 623-18). All sums received by the association from the professional for consumers must be immediately deposited at the Caisse des dépôts et consignations in a specific account opened for the group (Art. L 623-10, R 623-23 and R 623-24). Only the association may operate this account. The professional bears all enforcement recovery costs (Art. L 623-21).

Difficulties During Compensation: The Juge de la Mise en État

During the indemnification phase, the court that rendered the first judgment retains exclusive jurisdiction to resolve difficulties (Art. L 623-19). The first judgment's referral to mise en état (Art. R 623-8) keeps the judge seized. Difficulties must be submitted to the juge de la mise en état before the compensation deadline expires; the indemnification clock is suspended until the judge's order, which cannot be appealed (Art. R 623-25). Typical difficulties include: disputes about the legitimacy of certain adhesions; requests for provision; and problems with document or brief transmission. This is a notable procedural anomaly compared with standard civil proceedings, where the first judgment normally divests the court of its jurisdiction.

Stage 6 — The Second Judgment: Unsatisfied Claims or Extinction

6
Second Judgment: Ruling on All Outstanding Claims in One Decision Arts. L 623-19 to L 623-21; R 623-26 to R 623-29

After the compensation deadline expires, the court renders its second judgment. Where the association has referred unsatisfied compensation claims back to the court, the judge rules on all of them in a single decision (Art. R 623-10). Unsatisfied claims must be brought before the court in the form of written conclusions served between lawyers and filed with the clerk, within the deadline fixed in the first judgment (Art. R 623-26).

Where no unsatisfied claims have been referred back, the court declares the proceedings extinguished (Art. R 623-27).

Enforcement After the Second Judgment

If the professional fails to execute the second judgment voluntarily, the association represents the non-compensated consumers in enforcement proceedings. For this purpose, the association is treated as a creditor under Arts. L 111-1 and L 111-2 of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution (Art. R 623-28). All acts relating to enforcement must specify, on pain of nullity, the identity of the consumers on whose behalf the association is acting (Art. R 623-29).

The Asymmetric Res Judicata: The Professional Is Bound; Consumers Are Not

The most intellectually striking feature of the action de groupe is the asymmetric res judicata effect of the first judgment (Art. L 623-28):

For the Professional Bound immediately from pronouncement
The first judgment has res judicata authority from the moment of pronouncement as against both the professional and the association (CPC Art. 480)
The professional is bound even though they do not yet know how many consumers will join the group or what the total financial exposure will be
The professional cannot challenge the first judgment's finding of liability in the second judgment or in any subsequent proceedings between the same parties on the same facts
The asymmetry is widely noted in academic commentary as exorbitant: the professional bears the full weight of a final judgment before the scope of their liability is even known
For Individual Consumers Bound only once their damage is repaired
The first judgment only acquires res judicata authority against a consumer once their individual damage has been repaired under the class action procedure (Art. L 623-28)
A consumer who chooses not to join the group remains completely free to bring their own individual action for the same harm
A group member whose harm was not repaired within the class action can also pursue individual proceedings for the uncompensated portion
A group member can always bring an individual action for harm outside the scope defined by the first judgment — for example, for moral harm or personal injury (Art. L 623-29)
The Asymmetry and Its Implications for Strategy

The asymmetric res judicata is one of the most defendant-unfavourable structural features of the action de groupe. The professional faces a finding of liability that is immediately final and binding on them, while remaining exposed to an unknown aggregate financial obligation that only crystallises progressively as consumers join over the adhesion window. A professional who appeals the first judgment successfully avoids the binding liability finding; a professional who does not appeal is locked in even before any consumer has joined the group. This makes the decision whether to appeal the first judgment one of the most important strategic choices in the entire class action.

The Procedure at a Glance

Stage Key actor(s) Key deliverable Deadline / window Key articles
1 — SummonsAssociationAssignation with individual cases; approval decree; prescription suspendedAssociation's choiceR 623-3; L 623-27
2 — First judgmentCourtLiability; group definition; harm framework; information measures; adhesion window; compensation deadline; mise en état referralCourt-set; bref délai appealL 623-4 to L 623-13; R 623-8
3 — Information campaignProfessional (or association if default)R 623-16 mandatory content disseminated via court-ordered channelsCourt-set deadline; after exhaustion of all appealsL 623-7; R 623-7; R 623-16
4 — Adhesion windowConsumersOpt-in declarations; mandate to association constituted2 to 6 months after information campaignL 623-8; L 623-9; R 623-17 to R 623-21
5 — CompensationProfessional + associationEach member compensated per first judgment; funds deposited at Caisse des dépôts; difficulties to mise en étatCourt-set deadline (suspended during mise en état difficulties)L 623-10; L 623-11; L 623-18 to L 623-21; R 623-25
6 — Second judgmentCourtRules on all unsatisfied claims in one decision, or declares extinctionCourt-set deadline for filing unsatisfied claimsL 623-19 to L 623-21; R 623-26 to R 623-29
Stage 1 — Summons
Key actorAssociation
DeliverableAssignation with individual cases; approval decree; prescription suspended
ArticlesR 623-3; L 623-27
Stage 2 — First Judgment
Key actorCourt
DeliverableLiability; group definition; harm framework; information measures; adhesion window; compensation deadline; mise en état referral
ArticlesL 623-4 to L 623-13; R 623-8 — bref délai appeal
Stage 3 — Information Campaign
Key actorProfessional (or association if default)
DeliverableR 623-16 mandatory content via court-ordered channels; after all appeals exhausted
ArticlesL 623-7; R 623-7; R 623-16
Stage 4 — Adhesion Window (2–6 months)
Key actorConsumers
DeliverableOpt-in declarations; mandate to association constituted
ArticlesL 623-8; L 623-9; R 623-17 to R 623-21
Stage 5 — Compensation & Mise en État
Key actorProfessional + association
DeliverableEach member compensated; funds deposited at Caisse des dépôts; difficulties to mise en état
ArticlesL 623-10; L 623-11; L 623-18 to L 623-21; R 623-25
Stage 6 — Second Judgment
Key actorCourt
DeliverableRules on all unsatisfied claims in one decision, or declares extinction
ArticlesL 623-19 to L 623-21; R 623-26 to R 623-29
Practical Guidance for Defendant Businesses
The individual cases in the summons are the factual foundation of the entire action. The juge de la mise en état cannot assess their relevance at the preliminary stage (Cass. 1re civ., 27 June 2018) — but the quality and specificity of those cases will influence the first judgment on the scope of the group and harm categories.
The first judgment must be appealed using the bref délai accelerated procedure. This is the most important strategic decision in the proceedings: a favourable first judgment not appealed is immediately final as against the professional.
Not appealing locks the professional into a binding liability finding before knowing how many consumers will join or what the total exposure will be — the asymmetric res judicata effect is immediate upon the first judgment being rendered.
The information campaign and adhesion window cannot start until all appeals (including the pourvoi en cassation) are exhausted, except in competition class actions. An appeal therefore delays the entire process, which may be strategically desirable or undesirable depending on circumstances.
The court can order the professional to pay a provision on the association's costs and to consign part of the compensation sums at the Caisse des dépôts even at the first judgment stage. Cash-flow implications should be assessed early.
Difficulties during the compensation phase must be referred to the juge de la mise en état before the indemnification deadline expires, or the compensation clock continues to run. These orders cannot be appealed, making proactive engagement essential.
The professional must implement the consumer information campaign at their own expense, using all channels the court orders. Failure to implement within the deadline shifts execution to the association, still at the professional's cost.
Consumers who join the group cannot subsequently sue the professional individually for the same compensated harm — but consumers who do not join, or whose claims are not fully resolved within the class action, remain free to bring individual proceedings using the same factual findings.
Facing a Consumer Class Action in France?

The procedural complexity of the action de groupe — two judgments, an appeal window, a multi-month adhesion phase, and continuing jurisdiction through the mise en état — means that early strategic advice is critical. Our articles cover every stage of the process and the choices available to defendant businesses at each one.

Book a Consultation

This article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. The information reflects the state of the law as updated to April 2024; a legislative reform of the action de groupe framework was at that date still under parliamentary discussion. Always seek qualified legal advice before making decisions in active litigation.