Who Can Refer a Matter to the CEPC
Article L 440-1, IV-al. 1 of the Code de commerce sets out an open list of referral entitlements. The CEPC can also act on its own initiative (se saisir d'office).
The minister responsible for the economy can refer any commercial practice or document falling within the CEPC's scope. This governmental referral route ensures that the Commission can be engaged on matters of macro-economic or regulatory policy concern, not just individual commercial disputes.
The minister with sectoral responsibility (agriculture, industry, digital, etc.) can also refer practices falling within their sector. This allows sector-specific commercial practices to be examined by the body best placed to analyse them in their economic context.
The president of the French competition authority can refer commercial practices to the CEPC. This creates a formal coordination mechanism between the CEPC's advisory function and the competition authority's enforcement function — the two institutions can exchange perspectives on practices that sit at the boundary of commercial law and competition law.
Any producer, supplier, or reseller who considers themselves harmed by a commercial practice (s'estimant lésé par une pratique commerciale) can refer the practice to the CEPC. This is the primary private-party route and requires no minimum financial threshold or prior formal step. The harm may be potential or actual.
Any legal person (personne morale) can refer a matter, including professional organisations, trade unions, approved consumer associations, chambers of commerce, and chambers of agriculture. This reflects the CEPC's role as a general observatory of B2B commercial practices, not just a dispute-resolution body for individual parties.
The CEPC can place matters on its own agenda without any external referral. This own-initiative power allows the Commission to address systemic or emerging commercial practices that come to its attention through its observatory function or annual report work, without waiting for a formal referral to arrive.
Despite the CEPC's strong anonymity protections (see below), anonymous referrals are expressly declared inadmissible. This applies whether the anonymity is direct or through an intermediary such as a lawyer. The referral letter must identify the author of the referral. The CEPC's anonymity framework protects the identity of the referrer from Commission members and the public — but the referrer must be known to the CEPC secretariat from the outset.
Formal Requirements for a Private Party Referral
The referral (saisine) must be made by simple letter addressed to the president of the Commission. There is no court filing, no legal representative requirement, and no fee. The letter must contain the following:
The Anonymity Procedure
Anonymity is a cornerstone of the CEPC's design. Although referrers cannot be anonymous to the CEPC itself, the process ensures that Commission members and the public cannot identify the parties involved.
The president and vice-president of the CEPC are personally responsible for ensuring that all documents, enquiry reports, and information collected are anonymised before being circulated to the Commission (Art. D 440-11). The CEPC secretariat must remove all nominative references from documents and, where necessary, withdraw any pieces that would allow a person or company to be identified. This process applies before any material is passed to Commission members for examination.
The CEPC is physically located within the DGCCRF's premises, but it maintains a separate secretariat, which is specifically designed to guarantee the anonymity of referrals. The institutional separation of the secretariat from the broader DGCCRF structure provides an additional structural safeguard for confidentiality.
The anonymity framework is what makes the CEPC usable by businesses that want legal clarity on a practice without publicly revealing either that they are uncertain about the practice's legality or that they have been the subject of complaints. A supplier that suspects a major retailer's commercial terms are unlawful can seek a CEPC opinion without the retailer ever knowing the supplier made the referral — and without any public disclosure of the practice before the CEPC has had a chance to assess it. This confidential audit function is one of the CEPC's most practically valuable features for businesses navigating complex B2B commercial relationships.
Court Referrals: The Judicial Consultation Route
Courts have their own distinct route to consulting the CEPC, entirely separate from the private party referral procedure (Art. L 440-1, IV-al. 2). A court seized of a case involving commercial practices within the CEPC's scope may consult the Commission for its opinion on those practices.
The decision to consult the CEPC is left to the sovereign discretion of the trial court (appréciation discrétionnaire des juges du fond). The court is not required to explain its decision to consult the Commission (Cass. com., 15 November 2023, n° 22-10.818 F-B, RJDA 2/24 n° 133). No party can require the court to seek a CEPC opinion, and no party can prevent it from doing so.
The court's decision to consult the CEPC cannot be challenged. There is no appeal route against the referral itself (Art. L 440-1, IV-al. 3). Parties to the litigation must accept the consultation as part of the procedural framework.
From the moment the CEPC is consulted, all substantive decisions in the case are suspended until the CEPC's opinion is received, or until the four-month deadline expires — whichever comes first. The court may however take urgent or conservatory measures as needed during the suspension period.
The CEPC must communicate its opinion to the referring court within four months of the referral. This is a hard deadline: if no opinion is received within four months, proceedings resume regardless.
The CEPC's opinion does not bind the court. The court remains free to rule as it considers appropriate, with or without following the opinion's analysis. The opinion is published only after the court has rendered its decision — not before, to avoid any risk of influencing the proceedings (Art. L 440-1, IV-al. 3 and 4).
The Cour de cassation clarified in its November 2023 ruling (Cass. com., 15 November 2023, n° 22-10.818 F-B) that the faculty to refer a matter to the CEPC is left to the appréciation discrétionnaire of the trial court judges, and that their decision need not be motivated. This confirmation matters for parties to litigation involving commercial practices: they cannot force a court to seek a CEPC opinion, and they cannot challenge the court's decision to do so, or not to do so. The CEPC referral route in litigation is entirely within the court's own control.
The CEPC referral procedure is one of several tools available to businesses operating in France's distribution chain. Understanding when and how to use it — alongside the DGCCRF, the Autorité de la concurrence, and the courts — is part of any comprehensive commercial law strategy.
Book a ConsultationThis article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Always seek qualified legal advice for your specific situation.
Get Advice
Contracting with a French Party?
We advise sellers and buyers on French sales law, warranties, retention of title and cross-border terms. Speak to our team.
Get Legal AdviceKey Legal References
Who can refer to the CEPC; own-initiative power; court referral route; 4-month deadline; proceedings suspended
Anonymisation of all documents before circulation to Commission members — president and vice-president's personal responsibility
Mandatory content of the referral letter: identity, object, legal provisions alleged, supporting documents
Court referral discretion — no obligation to motivate the decision; cannot be appealed; confirmed by Cour de cassation 2023
CEPC address: 59 bd Vincent-Auriol, Bât. Condorcet, Télédoc 252, 75703 Paris Cedex 13 — cepc@finances.gouv.fr
