The Framework: Why Démembrement Complicates Capital Gains
A standard capital gain is the difference between the sale price and the acquisition cost. Démembrement introduces two variables that change both numbers. First, the who: when usufruit and nue-propriété are held by different parties, the tax liability may fall on one, the other, or both depending on how the sale is structured and whether the proceeds are split between the parties. Second, the what: the acquisition cost of a split right depends on whether it was acquired directly as a split right, carved out of a previously full ownership, or received gratuitously — and each route produces a different calculation.
French tax law treats capital gains on démembrement through two separate regimes: the plus-values immobilières rules for real estate (CGI Art. 150 U and following), and the plus-values mobilières rules for securities and company shares (CGI Art. 150-0 A and following). The principles overlap but are not identical — and the securities rules are significantly more detailed about who is taxable depending on how the sale price is attributed.
Four scenarios: isolated sale of one right; joint sale with price split; sale of full property after reunion; sale by an SCI whose parts are démembred. Tax at 19% flat plus social levies (17.2%), with duration-based abatements. Non-residents taxed on French property regardless of residence.
Post-3 July 2001 rules and pre-3 July 2001 rules. Key variable: whether the price is split between the rights holders or attributed entirely to one party. Tax at 12.8% (PFU) plus social levies (17.2%), or option for progressive income tax rates. Duration abatements largely limited to pre-2018 acquisitions.
Real Estate: Selling One Right in Isolation
When the Right Was Acquired Directly as a Split Right
Where the usufruit or nue-propriété was acquired directly — by gift, inheritance, or purchase — as a split right, the capital gain is the difference between the sale price and the acquisition cost of that specific right. For rights received gratuitously, the acquisition cost is the value declared for gift or inheritance tax at the time of the transfer. For purchased rights, it is the purchase price (CGI Art. 150 VB). An adjustment applies where the démembrement arose from a succession that opened before 1 January 2004: the acquisition cost must be recalculated using the current barème of Article 669 CGI based on the usufruitier's age at the date of the current sale, not the original succession.
When the Right Was Carved Out of a Previous Full Ownership
The more common scenario in family planning: the seller acquired the property in full ownership and subsequently carved out the démembrement — typically by donating the nue-propriété and retaining the usufruit. In this case the acquisition cost of the right being sold is a fraction of the original full purchase price. That fraction is determined using the barème of Article 669 CGI based on the usufruitier's age at the date of the current sale — not the purchase date. All ancillary costs (notarial fees, transfer taxes) are allocated in the same proportion (CGI Annex II Art. 74 SE).
A property was purchased in full ownership in December 2003 for €100. The owner (now aged 71) sells only the viager usufruit in February 2023 for €50.
Fraction of acquisition cost attributable to usufruit: 30% × €100 = €30
Capital gain: €50 − €30 = €20
Holding period for abatements: from December 2003 (full ownership acquisition date) = 19 years
Holding Period — Duration Abatements
For isolated sales, the holding period for the progressive duration abatement on real estate gains (which eliminates the gain entirely after 22 years for income tax and 30 years for social levies) runs from the date the specific right was acquired. A nu-propriétaire who received the nue-propriété by gift five years ago has a five-year holding period — the parent-usufruitier's twenty-year ownership does not carry over.
Real Estate: Selling Both Rights Together
Where the usufruitier and nu-propriétaire sell the full property jointly, each party is in principle taxable on a gain attributable to their own right, calculated on the basis of their respective share of the sale price. The price split between the two rights follows the barème of Article 669 CGI as a practical default — though both parties may agree to use economic valuation instead, provided the same method is used for both rights (BOI-RFPI-PVI-20-10-10 n° 320).
Primary Residence Exemption
The usufruitier who occupies the property as their primary residence can claim the exemption on their share of the gain. The nu-propriétaire who does not occupy the property generally cannot. A taxpayer who holds only the usufruit or nue-propriété of their primary residence is nonetheless treated by the administration as owning that residence — meaning they may be denied the "first sale of a non-primary-residence" exemption when selling another property (CE 15-7-2021 n° 453490). The €15,000 low-value exemption is assessed against the full property value, not just the value of the démembred right being sold.
Real Estate: Selling Full Property After Reunion of the Two Rights
When the usufruit extinguishes on the usufruitier's death and the nu-propriétaire becomes full owner and then sells, the capital gains calculation depends on how each right was originally acquired. The four combinations produce different cost bases and holding periods:
| How nue-propriété acquired | How usufruit acquired | Cost base for full property sale | Holding period starts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gratuitously (gift or succession) | Natural extinction (death) | Full property value at time nue-propriété entered estate (administration concession) | Date nue-propriété acquired |
| Onerous purchase | Natural extinction (death) | Purchase price of nue-propriété only (usufruit cost = nil) | Date nue-propriété acquired |
| Both acquired simultaneously gratuitously (same succession) | Gratuitously in same event | Sum of declared values of both rights at transmission | Earlier acquisition |
| Gratuitously | Onerous purchase | Declared value of nue-propriété + purchase price of usufruit | Earlier of the two acquisitions |
Where the nu-propriétaire received the nue-propriété gratuitously (by gift or inheritance) and the usufruit extinguishes by the usufruitier's natural death, the administration allows the cost base for any subsequent sale to be the full property value at the time the nue-propriété was originally acquired — not merely the nue-propriété portion. This administrative concession, which does not apply to securities, means that if the property has not appreciated since the original gift or succession, the capital gain on a subsequent sale may be nil. It is a major practical advantage of the family démembrement structure for real estate, and one reason why patience often pays.
Securities Capital Gains: Post-3 July 2001 Démembrements
For securities and company shares where the démembrement was constituted on or after 3 July 2001, the administration has published detailed rules on who bears the tax depending on how the sale proceeds are attributed (BOI-RPPM-PVBMI-20-10-20-60).
Scenario A: Isolated Sale or Joint Sale with Price Split
Where either party sells their right alone, or the parties sell jointly and actually divide the price between themselves, each party is separately taxable on the gain attributable to their right. Where neither party previously held full ownership — both received their rights simultaneously from the same gratuitous transmission — the cost base is the full property value declared at that transmission. Where one party previously held full ownership and created the démembrement, the cost of the right sold is a fraction of the original full ownership purchase price, split between usufruit and nue-propriété using either the barème or economic valuation — both parties must use the same method.
Pierre (usufruitier, aged 58) and Henri (nu-propriétaire) sell securities jointly. The original full ownership cost was €20. Sale price is €100 in full ownership.
Pierre: sale price €50, cost base 50% × €20 = €10, gain = €40
Henri: sale price €50, cost base 50% × €20 = €10, gain = €40
Total: €80
Using economic valuation: usufruit estimated at €45, nue-propriété at €55
Pierre: €45 − €9 = €36 | Henri: €55 − €11 = €44 | Total: €80
The total gain is always €80 regardless of method. The allocation between parties differs — which matters if one benefits from abatements or exemptions unavailable to the other. Both must use the same method.
Scenario B: Joint Sale Without Price Split — Reinvestment with Report of Démembrement
Where both rights are sold but the proceeds are reinvested in new démembred assets rather than split between the parties, the capital gain is taxable in the hands of the nu-propriétaire on the full gain (BOI-RPPM-PVBMI-20-10-20-60 n° 100). The cost base is the original full property acquisition cost (or declared value at gratuitous acquisition).
A special exception exists for securities portfolios (universalités de biens) arising from a succession: with an express and irrevocable option filed with the account-holding bank, the administration accepts that the usufruitier is taxable instead of the nu-propriétaire. This option is only available where the démembrement is of successoral origin — it does not apply where the démembrement arose from a donation.
Scenario C: Joint Sale Without Price Split — Quasi-Usufruit on Proceeds
Where all sale proceeds are attributed to the usufruitier under a quasi-usufruit arrangement, the capital gain is taxable entirely in the hands of the usufruitier (BOI-RPPM-PVBMI-20-10-20-60 n° 100). The nu-propriétaire bears no immediate tax, receiving instead a debt claim against the usufruitier's estate deductible for inheritance tax purposes when the usufruit eventually ends.
The Conseil d'État has ruled that where the nu-propriétaire bears the full tax in a reinvestment joint sale, they may include in their deductible acquisition costs not only the gift tax they themselves paid on the nue-propriété but also the tax paid by the usufruitier on the usufruit — since the nu-propriétaire alone bears the full tax liability (CE 11-5-2017 n° 402479). By analogy, where the usufruitier is taxable under a quasi-usufruit, they should be able to deduct the gift taxes paid by both parties.
Holding Period for Securities Gains
For securities, the holding period runs from the date the taxable person acquired their own right. Where the nu-propriétaire is taxable (reinvestment scenario), the period runs from the nu-propriétaire's acquisition date. A donation of nue-propriété to children shortly before a sale resets their holding period to the gift date — potentially eliminating any duration abatement that the parent's longer holding period would have generated. Note that since 2018, duration-based abatements on securities gains only apply where the taxpayer opts for the progressive income tax rate rather than the flat PFU rate — and only for pre-2018 acquisitions.
Securities: Selling Full Property After Reunion of the Two Rights
For securities, the rules after natural extinction of the usufruit are less generous than for real estate. The default principle is that the usufruit's extinction is at nil cost (it was received free, and Article 1133 CGI ensures no tax at extinction). Therefore the cost base for the nu-propriétaire's subsequent sale of the full portfolio is only the value of the nue-propriété at the time it was acquired — not the full property value as is the case for real estate (BOI-RPPM-PVBMI-20-10-20-60 n° 200).
Jean-Paul (55) gives the nue-propriété of a share portfolio to son Arthur. Portfolio is worth €100; nue-propriété = €50 (50% for a 55-year-old). Jean-Paul dies. Arthur sells the full portfolio for €210.
Usufruit extinction cost: nil (acquired for free)
Capital gain: €210 − €50 = €160
Compare to real estate: for an equivalent property, the administration allows the full property value (€100) as cost base after natural extinction — gain would be only €110. The securities rule is materially less generous.
The exception: where both the usufruit and nue-propriété were transmitted simultaneously in the same gratuitous transmission to different beneficiaries, the nu-propriétaire's cost base includes both the declared value of the nue-propriété and the declared value of the usufruit at the time of that transmission.
Pre-3 July 2001 Démembrements
Securities whose démembrement predates 3 July 2001 are subject to the old regime regardless of when they are sold. The main differences from the post-2001 rules:
- Isolated sale or joint sale with price split: each party is taxed on their own gain — identical to post-2001
- Joint sale with reinvestment in démembred assets: nu-propriétaire is taxable — identical to post-2001 in outcome, but the option for the usufruitier to be taxable instead is not available for pre-2001 démembrements, even for successoral-origin portfolios
- Joint sale with quasi-usufruit: the administration has not expressly addressed this for pre-2001 démembrements — the post-2001 analysis (usufruitier taxable) is generally considered to apply by analogy
Where a taxpayer holds securities of the same type, some démembred before 3 July 2001 and some after, two separate weighted average cost base calculations apply, creating significant complexity in any partial sale of the mixed portfolio.
Donation-Avant-Cession: Eliminating Capital Gains Before a Sale
The donation-avant-cession is the most widely used capital gains elimination technique in French wealth planning. Rather than selling an asset and paying tax on a large latent gain, the owner first donates it — resetting the donee's cost base to the current value — and then the donees sell shortly after. Since the sale price equals the value at the time of the donation, the donees' capital gain is nil or minimal.
The démembrement variant is more tax-efficient: donating only the nue-propriété reduces the gift tax base to the barème percentage while simultaneously resetting the nue-propriété's cost base to current value. The gain on the nue-propriété is purged; the donor retains the usufruit and remains taxable on any gain on the usufruit portion at sale. For the strategy to be effective and survive challenge, several conditions are non-negotiable:
- The donation must genuinely and irrevocably precede the finalised sale. A donation made while a sale is under negotiation but before the last condition suspensive is fulfilled has been upheld — courts have validated donations made two days before a property sale and ten days before an option exercise on shares
- The donor must actually divest themselves of the donated asset — the transfer must be real, not nominal
- A legitimate family purpose beyond tax savings is strongly advisable to withstand the abuse-of-law provisions of Articles L 64 and L 64 A of the Tax Procedure Code
The tax authority regularly challenges donation-avant-cession arrangements. The Conseil d'État has found abuse of law where a quasi-usufruit on the sale proceeds was constructed after the sale, in breach of a reinvestment clause — allowing the donor to effectively reappropriate the full proceeds without genuine indebtedness to the donees (CE 14-10-2015 n° 374440). It upheld the arrangement where the quasi-usufruit was expressly provided for in the original donation deed from the outset, creating a genuine documented debt of restitution (CE 10-2-2017 n° 387960). It also upheld a donation with a remploi clause requiring reinvestment in capitalisation contracts with démembrement carrying over, where the donors remained indebted for any withdrawals (CE 31-3-2017 n° 395550). The deed's drafting is decisive.
The capital gains analysis depends critically on how each right was acquired, who is taxable, and whether a donation strategy is available. Our guides cover the complete French démembrement tax framework.
Book a ConsultationThis article is provided for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute tax advice. Capital gains tax on démembrement is highly fact-specific — the correct analysis depends on the date and method of acquisition of each right, the age of the usufruitier, the type of asset, applicable bilateral tax treaties for non-residents, and the specific terms of any prior gift or inheritance. Always seek advice from a qualified French tax adviser or notaire before any sale involving split-ownership assets.
Get Advice
Contracting with a French Party?
We advise sellers and buyers on French sales law, warranties, retention of title and cross-border terms. Speak to our team.
Get Legal AdviceKey Legal References
Real estate CGT scope: taxable events, exemptions, non-residents
Real estate acquisition cost: gratuitous acquisition = declared value at gift or succession; purchased rights = purchase price
Real estate duration abatements: 22-year income tax exemption; 30-year social charges exemption
Carved right cost base: barème fraction of original full ownership cost based on usufruitier’s age at sale date (not purchase date)
Securities CGT scope: all disposals for consideration; taxable in year of title transfer
Fiscal barème: 9 age brackets for valuing usufruit and nue-propriété
No registration duty on natural extinction of usufruit by death
Securities post-2001: reinvestment joint sale = nu-propriétaire taxable; quasi-usufruit joint sale = usufruitier taxable; option for usufruitier taxation available for successoral-origin démembrements only
Real estate joint sale cost base split: barème or economic valuation; same method for both parties
Nu-propriétaire may deduct gift taxes paid by both parties where they bear full tax on reinvestment joint sale of securities
Quasi-usufruit expressly stipulated in original donation deed from outset: valid; creates genuine debt of restitution; not abuse of law
Remploi clause requiring reinvestment in capitalisation contracts with démembrement carrying over: valid where donors remained indebted for withdrawals
Quasi-usufruit constructed after sale in breach of reinvestment clause: abuse of law; donors reappropriated proceeds without genuine indebtedness
Usufruit or nue-propriété holder of primary residence: treated as owner for primary residence exemption purposes; may be denied first-sale-non-primary exemption on another property
Abuse of law (classic): principal purpose of tax avoidance, contrary to legislative intent
Abuse of law (principally fiscal purpose): anti-avoidance where principal purpose (but not exclusive) is tax saving
