The Principles of Démembrement

French civil law allows full ownership (pleine propriété) to be divided into two separate real rights: usufruct (usufruit) and bare ownership (nue-propriété). Full ownership can alternatively be split between bare ownership and a right of use and habitation (droit d'usage et d'habitation — DUH). Both configurations are founded on the same principle: the different rights are held by different persons for a defined period, after which the bare owner automatically recovers full ownership without any further formality, tax, or payment. In practice, démembrement with a DUH is most common in retirement residences, while démembrement with usufruit is more common in leisure and tourism schemes.

Usufruit — Usufruct
NatureReal right to use and enjoy the asset and collect its fruits (income), including rents
LettingThe usufructuary may let the property to third parties and collect the rents (C. civ. Art. 595)
TransferThe usufructuary may sell or transfer the usufruct itself, or make a gratuitous transfer of it
RepairsResponsible for maintenance and running repairs (réparations d'entretien); not for grosses réparations (C. civ. Art. 605)
ExtinctionTerminates at the death of the usufructuary (if life usufruct), or at expiry of the agreed fixed term
Typical useLeisure and tourism schemes: developer retains usufruct; investor buys nue-propriété at discount
Droit d'Usage et d'Habitation — DUH
NaturePersonal real right to use the property and inhabit it personally
LettingThe DUH holder cannot let the right to a third party, nor transfer or assign it
TransferNon-transferable and non-assignable by nature
RepairsSame allocation as usufruct: DUH holder bears maintenance; bare owner bears grosses réparations
ExtinctionTerminates at expiry of the fixed term for which it was granted (C. civ. Art. 617 by reference to Art. 625)
Typical useRetirement residences: resident holds DUH; investor holds nue-propriété

The Prépropriété Model: How the Investment Works

In the leisure real estate context, the démembrement investment is known as prépropriété. The developer splits the ownership of a furnished apartment, sells the bare ownership to the investor at a reduced price, and retains the usufruct — typically for a period between ten and twelve years. The developer-usufructuary furnishes the apartment, lets it to tourists or seasonal guests, and collects the rents. The investor-bare owner has no management or maintenance role during the usufruct period and will have few charges to pay. This passive character is one of the distinguishing features of the nue-propriété investment compared with a direct furnished letting.

Why the acquisition price is reduced

The price paid by the investor for the bare ownership is lower than the full ownership price of the same property. This reduction reflects the fact that the investor cedes to the usufructuary all economic benefit of the property — the rents and the right to occupy — for the duration of the démembrement. Some schemes provide for no rent at all and no personal use during the entire usufruct period; others provide a guaranteed annual rent plus a limited number of weeks of personal use. The largest discount corresponds to the investor receiving no rent and no personal use during the bail period.

Where the investor receives no rent, the structure is based on an advance on rents: the management company pays the developer the present value of all rents for the full bail period at the outset, the developer transfers that debt to the management company, and when rents would have fallen due they are settled by mutual set-off (compensation). This mechanism has specific tax implications for the investor at the time the advance rents are treated as received.

Personal use during the démembrement period

Depending on the terms of the contract, the investor-bare owner may be entitled to personal occupancy of their apartment — or of an equivalent apartment in another property in the same group — for a limited number of weeks per year. This right is contractual and depends entirely on what has been agreed with the developer; it is not a consequence of the legal structure itself.

Repairs: The Allocation Between Bare Owner and Usufructuary

Maintenance and running repairs — usufructuary's responsibility

Ordinary maintenance and running repairs (réparations d'entretien) are the responsibility of the usufructuary under C. civ. Art. 605. These cover the day-to-day upkeep of the property: internal decoration, replacement of fixtures and fittings, maintenance of installations, and general servicing.

Grosses réparations — bare owner's responsibility

Major structural repairs (grosses réparations) are the responsibility of the bare owner under C. civ. Art. 606. These cover the principal structural elements: load-bearing walls (gros murs), main beams (poutres), roofing, and in general any work affecting the structure of the building. The bare owner investor is therefore theoretically liable for significant expenditure if major structural work is required during the usufruct period.

In practice, for new-build properties — which is the standard case in leisure démembrement schemes — these grosses réparations will in most cases fall within the ten-year construction warranty (garantie décennale) and will be covered by the builders' liability insurance throughout practically the entire démembrement period. The coincidence of the ten-year décennale warranty with the typical ten-to-twelve-year usufruct period means that the investor's exposure to out-of-pocket structural repair costs during the démembrement is very limited in practice.

Important: Leases Granted by the Usufructuary

Any lease granted by the usufructuary to an occupant of the property remains binding on the bare owner even after the usufruct ends — the lease is opposable to the bare owner on the extinction of the usufruct. In leisure démembrement schemes this risk is described as limited, because the leases in question are typically short-term tourist or holiday leases of furnished premises. Investors should nevertheless check the contractual arrangements carefully to ensure that leases are structured to expire before or concurrently with the end of the usufruct.

Two-Tier and Three-Tier Structures

The standard démembrement model — developer retains usufruit; investor buys nue-propriété — is a two-tier structure. A three-tier variant is typically used in retirement and service residences: the developer sells the bare ownership to the investor, retains the usufruct, and then creates and transfers a droit d'usage et d'habitation to an end-user (for example, a retirement home resident). In this three-tier arrangement, the developer holds the usufruct as an intermediate right between the bare owner investor and the DUH holder.

Démembrement and Copropriété

Where the building is sold in individual lots to multiple investors, the copropriété statute applies and a règlement de copropriété must be established. Where the developer sells the entire building en bloc to a single investor, there is no copropriété.

The mandataire commun requirement

Where copropriété applies, French law creates a specific complication for démembered lots. Under Loi 65-557 du 10 juillet 1965 Art. 23, where a copropriété lot is in indivision, subject to usufruct, or subject to a DUH, a single mandataire commun must be appointed to exercise voting rights at the general assembly on behalf of all rights-holders in that lot. If the parties cannot agree, the court designates the mandataire on application of any interested party or the syndic.

In practice, in a scheme where all investor-bare owners have transferred the usufruct of their lots to the same developer-promoter, the règlement de copropriété typically designates the usufructuary-promoter as the common representative. The consequence is that the investor-bare owners have no voting power in the copropriété's general assembly for as long as the usufruct persists. This is a structural feature of the investment that must be evaluated before acquisition.

Majority reduction rule: limited application in démembrement

Loi 65-557 Art. 22 provides that where a single copropriétaire holds more than half of the common parts quota, their votes are reduced to the sum of the votes of all other copropriétaires. However, under current law this rule does not apply in the case where a person who is not a majority copropriétaire on the basis of their full-ownership lots becomes a majority by adding the votes attached to lots of which they are usufructuary. In démembrement schemes where the promoter holds the usufruit of many lots, the majority reduction rule therefore offers no protection to investor-bare owners.

Practical Point: The Long-Term Bail with Price Reduction

A variant of the démembrement structure is the propriété avec bail de longue durée: the investor acquires full ownership and immediately lets the property to a management company under a long-term lease (typically nine to twelve years), with the management company bearing all copropriété charges and furniture maintenance costs. The investor may receive a reduced purchase price in exchange for not receiving rent — in which case the management company advances the total rent for the entire lease period at outset, and future rents are settled by set-off. The management company may qualify for commercial lease renewal rights if it provides services in the let premises (Cass. 3e civ. 10-2-1999 n° 97-14.669). This structure gives the investor full ownership immediately but binds them to the lease term.

Key Points: Démembrement de Propriété
Legal split: full ownership divided into nue-propriété + usufruit or DUH. Both are real rights held simultaneously by different persons. Automatic reconsolidation of full ownership in the bare owner's hands at extinction — no transfer tax, no supplementary payment required.
Usufruit (C. civ. Art. 578 s.): right to use, enjoy, and collect fruits including rents. Usufructuary may let to third parties (C. civ. Art. 595) and collect the rents. May be sold or transferred. Terminates at usufructuary's death or at expiry of fixed term. More common in leisure/tourism démembrement schemes.
DUH (C. civ. Art. 617 by ref. to Art. 625): personal right to use and inhabit. Cannot be let to or transferred to third parties. Terminates at expiry of fixed term. More common in retirement residence schemes. Three-tier structure possible: bare owner investor + intermediate usufructuary (developer) + end-user holding DUH.
Prépropriété model: developer retains usufruit for 10–12 years; sells nue-propriété to investor at reduced price; developer-usufructuary furnishes, lets, and collects rents; investor has no income, no management obligation during the period. Investor may have contractual personal use rights (weeks per year) — depends entirely on commercial terms agreed with developer.
Price reduction reflects cession of all economic benefit for the usufruct period. In no-rent structures: management company advances total rents at outset; debt transferred to management company by promoter; future rents settled by mutual set-off (compensation).
Repairs (C. civ. Art. 605–606): maintenance and running repairs = usufructuary's responsibility. Grosses réparations (load-bearing walls, beams, roofing) = bare owner investor's responsibility. In new-build schemes: grosses réparations mostly covered by the 10-year garantie décennale throughout practically the entire 10–12 year démembrement period.
Leases granted by usufructuary: binding on bare owner even after extinction of usufruct. In leisure schemes: limited risk since leases are typically short-term tourist lettings. Investors should verify that lease terms are structured to expire concurrently with the usufruct.
Copropriété complications (Loi 65-557 Art. 23): démembred lot requires appointment of single mandataire commun to vote at AGMs. Where all investors have transferred usufruit to same promoter: règlement de copropriété typically designates promoter-usufructuary as mandataire commun → investor-bare owners have no effective AGM voting rights during the démembrement period. Majority reduction rule (Art. 22): does not apply where person becomes majority only by combining full-ownership and usufruct lots — no protection for bare owners in this scenario.
Questions About Démembrement Investment in France?

Whether you are evaluating a nue-propriété acquisition in a leisure residence, assessing the repair allocation under a specific démembrement scheme, or reviewing the copropriété provisions before signing, our guides cover the complete French framework.

Book a Consultation

This article covers the legal mechanics of démembrement de propriété (usufruit and droit d'usage et d'habitation) in the context of leisure and tourism real estate investment in France. It does not cover the use of démembrement for estate planning purposes, IFI valuation of démembred assets, or the tax treatment of income received during the démembrement period. The garantie décennale reference concerns the 10-year structural warranty available under French construction law.