When Does Eviction Become Available?
At the expiry of a French commercial lease — whatever the cause (congé, activation of a resolutory clause, judicial termination, or any other means) — a tenant who remains in occupation becomes an occupant sans droit ni titre: an occupant without any legal basis for their presence. From that moment, the landlord may pursue eviction measures to obtain the clearance of the premises of persons and moveable property. The governing rules are found in Articles L 411-1 to L 451-1 and R 411-1 et seq. of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution.
The Indispensable Prerequisite: An Enforceable Title
The eviction procedure cannot be initiated without an enforceable title (titre exécutoire). The law is strict: the enforcement process begins only once a judicial eviction decision has been obtained, or in the alternative, an enforceable conciliation record has been signed — meaning an agreement between the parties on vacation of the premises, reached during proceedings, signed by all parties and by the judge, and rendered enforceable (C. exécution Art. L 411-1).
A protocol of agreement rendered enforceable by an ordonnance sur requête of the president of the tribunal does not constitute a valid title for eviction purposes (Cass. avis 20-10-2000 n° 20-20013). A jugement d'adjudication (adjudication judgment), by contrast, does constitute a valid enforceable title permitting eviction (C. exécution Art. L 322-13). Where the eviction title is a référé order that has been appealed, enforcement may still proceed in principle since the law permits enforcement on the basis of a provisionally enforceable title.
The landlord may pursue the eviction of sub-tenants who hold their occupancy title solely from the main tenant whose eviction has been ordered (Cass. 2e civ. 4-12-2003 n° 02-10.387). However, as long as the lease relationship between the main tenant and the landlord remains legally in existence, the landlord cannot act directly against the sub-tenant in eviction — only the main tenant can take that step (Cass. 3e civ. 1-2-2012 n° 10-22.863).
Jurisdiction and the Commandement
The decision ordering eviction of a commercial tenant falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal judiciaire, acting as the commercial tenancy court (C. org. jud. Art. R 211-3-26, 11°). The enforceability of the eviction judgment requires its formal service (signification) under Article 503 al. 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as service of the commandement d'avoir à libérer les locaux under Article L 411-1 of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution.
The Commandement d'Avoir à Quitter les Lieux
The commandement d'avoir à quitter les lieux is a formal act that must comply with the mandatory content requirements of Article R 411-1 of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution. A commandement that does not contain all required mentions is null.
- The identification of the enforceable title under which eviction is being pursued
- The designation of the court before which requests for delays and any disputes relating to the eviction may be brought
- The date from which the premises may be vacated
- A statement that from that date forced eviction of the occupant and all persons occupying under them may proceed
The commandement may be delivered as part of the same act as the service of the eviction judgment (Art. R 411-1 final al.). It must be formally served on the person against whom eviction was ordered, but it does not need to be served on occupants who claim their right from that person (Cass. 2e civ. 23-6-2016 n° 15-21.408). Once the commandement has been served, any request for a grace period must be addressed to the juge de l'exécution — not the juge des référés (Cass. 2e civ. 18-9-2003 n° 01-16.019).
The Enforcement Procedure: Step by Step
The bailiff cannot enter premises in the absence of the occupant without the concours of the force publique, except to confirm that the person evicted and those claiming through them have voluntarily vacated after service of the commandement (C. exécution Arts. L 451-1 and L 142-1). The provision allowing a bailiff to enter in the occupant's absence with a municipal authority or police presence applies to general enforcement but does not apply to eviction — only to confirming voluntary vacation (CA Montpellier 24-7-2002 ; CA Paris 23-1-2003).
When the Prefect Refuses: State Liability
Where the prefect refuses or fails to grant the force publique, the landlord has no further avenue against the tenant directly. Their recourse is against the State, whose liability is engaged for the refusal or unreasonable delay in granting police assistance to enforce a judicial decision. As a general rule, State liability arises at the expiry of a two-month delay following the requisition (CE 27-9-2006 n° 285279). However, where the circumstances are such that the landlord is suffering a particularly serious deprivation of their property requiring urgent action, the liability period may begin earlier (CE 18-6-2008 n° 285380). Pending enforcement, the juge de l'exécution may order the tenant to pay an indemnité d'occupation for the continued occupation in breach of the eviction order (Cass. 2e civ. 20-6-1996 n° 94-14.012).
Premises with a Residential Component
Where the commercial premises include a portion used as a dwelling, Article L 412-1 of the Code des procédures civiles d'exécution requires a minimum two-month delay between the commandement and enforcement. However, the courts have been careful not to allow this provision to obstruct the eviction of commercial tenants who use ancillary living accommodation incidentally. In a recent case involving a lease covering commercial restaurant space and ancillary living quarters, the court held that: the lease was commercial (its principal object was the restaurant activity); the two-month residential delay requirement did not apply since the manager's address on the company's Kbis extract was different from the leased premises; and the statutory rules on notification of the prefect applicable in residential evictions had no application in the commercial lease context (CA Caen 16-1-2025 n° 24/00560).
Landlord's Liability After Eviction
Once the eviction is carried out and the premises are cleared, they come under the landlord's custody and responsibility. The landlord may be held liable for any theft or damage to the tenant's goods that occurs in the premises after the eviction. The provision of Article 1725 of the Civil Code exonerating a landlord from liability for disturbances caused by third parties does not apply in this context — even if the eviction order is subsequently annulled on appeal (Cass. 3e civ. 5-1-2012 n° 10-12.741). This post-eviction liability creates a practical obligation for landlords to take immediate and documented control of the premises and any goods left behind, and to maintain proper insurance cover.
French commercial eviction requires careful procedural compliance at every stage — from obtaining the initial eviction title to the force publique requisition, the commandement formalities, and post-eviction liability. There is no shortcut.
Speak with a French LawyerThis article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Laws may have changed since publication. Always seek qualified French legal advice before initiating or contesting eviction proceedings.
Key Legal References
Title required for eviction: the enforcement process begins only once a judicial eviction decision has been obtained, or an enforceable conciliation record has been signed.
Commandement mandatory mentions on pain of nullity: the enforceable title, the designated court, the vacation date, and notice that forced eviction may follow from that date.
No entry without force publique: the bailiff cannot enter premises in the absence of the occupant without police assistance, except to confirm voluntary vacation.
Protocol rendered enforceable by ordonnance sur requête does not constitute a valid enforceable title for eviction purposes.
Exclusive jurisdiction: the tribunal judiciaire has exclusive jurisdiction to order eviction of a commercial tenant.
Commandement service: the commandement need not be served on occupants claiming through the evicted tenant; service on the evicted tenant alone suffices.
Grace period requests after service of the commandement must be addressed to the juge de l’exécution, not the référé judge.
State liability arises at the expiry of a 2-month delay following the requisition of the force publique after which an implicit rejection is deemed.
State liability may begin earlier where the landlord is suffering a particularly serious deprivation of their property requiring urgent action.
Sub-tenant eviction: the landlord may pursue eviction of sub-tenants holding their occupancy title solely from the main tenant whose eviction has been ordered.
Landlord’s liability after eviction: the landlord bears custody and liability for the evicted premises including for theft or damage to goods left behind, even if the eviction order is subsequently annulled on appeal.
